Advice can be heard; others can offer it to you, and you can read it in a book. But lessons take a practical form in your life—they come in the shape of pain, suffering, or sacrifices. That’s why they are called "lessons."

Lessons Are Practical

Many people do not benefit from advice, while very few can escape learning from lessons. Few take advantage of advice, and few fail to learn from lessons.

Learn From Advice

Lessons often come painfully. They may appear as an emotional experience, a financial loss, a great disappointment, the loss of an opportunity, or even the deprivation of sustenance. These experiences are painful, and some can even be destructive.

Lessons Are Painful

It is, therefore, surprising to find someone who benefits from a piece of advice despite its ease and equally surprising to see someone who does not benefit from a lesson despite its harshness!

Advice And Lessons

What you fail to learn as advice will come to you as a painful, harsh lesson. The more you heed advice, the fewer life lessons you’ll have to endure. The more you neglect lessons, the more you will suffer. None of us escapes both, but the wise are those who listen to advice before they are struck by a lesson.

Don't Neglect Lessons

Lessons are not necessarily the result of mistakes you have made. Sometimes, they are meant to correct your life’s course, redirect you to a path you wouldn’t have chosen through mere advice, or prepare you for something great ahead.

Lessons Are Not Your Mistakes

Because lessons put them through a tough experience—they feel what they have endured, remember their struggles, and recognize how their lives were before. On the other hand, advice comes detached from context, making it easy to overlook because it does not feel like part of their experience.

Why do people learn from lessons but not from advice?

Some Life Lessons Cannot Be Heard, No Matter How Many Times They Are Told—They Come as Lessons, Not Just Advice!

philosophy

Philosophy

personaldevelopment

Personal Development

mindfulness

Mindfulness

problemsolving

Problem Solving

Sweet Advices or Harsh Lessons?

Gregor's transformation into an insect symbolizes the profound alienation and isolation that individuals can experience, even within their own families. His inability to communicate and his increasingly grotesque appearance lead to his estrangement from his loved ones and society.

Alienation and Isolation

Kafka's novella highlights the inherent absurdity of life, where events often lack logical explanation or meaning. Gregor's inexplicable transformation and the family's reaction to it underscore the unpredictable and often nonsensical nature of existence.

The Absurdity of Life

The story explores the dehumanizing effects of modern life, particularly the pressures of work and societal expectations. Gregor's initial motivation for working is to support his family, but his job ultimately strips him of his identity and reduces him to a mere provider.

Dehumanization

"The Metamorphosis" delves into the complex dynamics of family relationships. Initially, Gregor's family relies on him for financial support, but his transformation forces them to confront their own dependency and their changing feelings towards him.

Family Dynamics

God gives the nuts, but he does not crack them

Gregor's physical transformation is not just a bizarre event but also a metaphor for the inner changes that individuals undergo throughout their lives. His struggle to adapt to his new form reflects the challenges of maintaining a sense of self in the face of change.

Identity and Transformation

The novella raises questions about empathy and compassion, both within families and in society at large. The characters' reactions to Gregor's transformation reveal their capacity for understanding and acceptance, as well as their limitations.

Empathy and Compassion

Through its surreal and thought-provoking narrative, "The Metamorphosis" invites readers to reflect on these themes and consider their own experiences of alienation, identity, and the human condition.

Why To Read The Story

Franz Kafka offers a wealth of insights into the human condition. This is the story of Gregor Samsa, a traveling salesman who wakes up one morning to find himself transformed into a monstrous insect. The story explores themes of alienation, family dynamics, and the absurdity of life.

The Metamorphosis (German: Die Verwandlung, also sometimes translated as The Transformation) is a novella by Franz Kafka, first published in 1915. It has been called one of the seminal works of fiction of the 20th century and is studied in colleges and universities across the Western world. The story begins with a traveling salesman, Gregor Samsa, waking to find himself transformed (metamorphosed) into a large, monstrous insect-like creature. The cause of Gregor's transformation is never revealed, and Kafka himself never gave an explanation. The rest of Kafka's novella deals with Gregor's attempts to adjust to his new condition as he deals with being burdensome to his parents and sister, who are repelled by the horrible, verminous creature Gregor has become.

motivationandinspiration

Motivation & Inspiration

loveandrelationships

Love & Relationships

books

Books

Franz Kafka

Metamorphosis

TRUMP V. THE UNITED STATES

In July 2024, the United States Supreme Court decided on the Trump V. United States case. It ruled, six to three, that all former and sitting Presidents and vice Presidents are immune from criminal prosecution and criminal law when making an ‘official executive action’. The main opinion of the approving six justices decision was emphasizing protecting executive independence and effective governance while excluding immunity for unofficial conduct. That effectively means that the president can do whatever they please even if it is a crime, as long as they label it an official executive action.

The Ordeal…

I believe that this decision has opened the floodgates to corruption, demagoguery, and ultimately dictatorship. This decision is unconstitutional and is harmful to our democracy. It threatens the integrity of American governance and accountability between the people and the government. It is an urgent problem that must be solved promptly.	 This landmark decision undermines the foundational civic principles of the rule of law, checks and balances, and equality. The founding fathers fought and died for a nation where all are created equal. Where no title would have more rights than another.

My Opinion

“A government of laws, and not of men.”

politics

Politics

leadershipandmanagement

Leadership & Management

Politics: A controversial court case

Edmund Burke writes to a young French reporter named Depont, asking for his thoughts on the revolutionary events unfolding in France. Burke expresses his strong opposition to the French Revolution and the Revolution Society, which collaborates with France’s National Assembly to spread revolutionary ideas to England.

Introduction

Burke begins his critique by addressing a sermon delivered by the dissenting preacher and political radical Richard Price. In his sermon, Price argues that the English people have the right to choose their own governors, remove them for misconduct, and create a government for themselves, drawing inspiration from the Glorious Revolution of 1688. Richard Price interpreted the Glorious Revolution in his book A Discourse on the Love of Our Country (1789) as a victory for the principles of liberty, democracy, and the people's right to choose their rulers.

Richard Price’s Sermon

Burke strongly disagrees with Price’s interpretation of the Glorious Revolution. He argues that the Declaration of Rights that followed it did not establish these supposed rights. Instead of determining how England’s rulers would be chosen, the declaration secured a clear line of Protestant succession as a safeguard for English freedoms.

Burke’s Interpretation of the Glorious Revolution

The leaders of the Glorious Revolution instituted regular parliamentary meetings, not as a blueprint for future uprisings, but as a defense of rights already outlined in the Magna Carta. Their actions were meant to preserve existing liberties, not to create an entirely new system of government.

Burke criticizes the French Revolution as an impulsive and reckless rebellion against an illegitimate monarchy, severing France from its historical and cultural roots. While he does not entirely dismiss the idea of natural rights, he argues that they are not a sufficient foundation for government.

The French Revolution

Instead, he believes government is a product of human wisdom, designed to address human needs based on a deep understanding of human nature and history, rather than abstract theories. He warns that an obsession with vague rights can cause people to lose sight of actual individuals and instead become mesmerized by the spectacle of change.

To illustrate his concerns, Burke recounts the attack on Versailles on October 6, 1789, when troops forced the king and queen to flee to Paris against their will. He portrays Queen Marie Antoinette in a sympathetic light, lamenting the erosion of honor and loyalty in France. He argues that the victory of the "Rights of Man" has made it more difficult for people to discern right from wrong.

Our patience will achieve more than force

Burke contrasts England’s respect for its long-held traditions and moral intuitions with France’s growing interest in radical deism and atheism. He emphasizes that England sees faith as the foundation of society, while France is abandoning these principles. Furthermore, he asserts that government should be regarded as a protector of society and moral order, not as an institution to be disrespected or overthrown.

Religious and Moral Decay in France

Burke questions whether the French Revolution was even necessary, pointing out that most French politicians in 1789 sought reform rather than full-scale revolution. While he acknowledges the problems within the monarchy, aristocracy, and church, he argues that none of these justified the creation of a "despotic democracy."Despotic democrary refers to a system where democratic structures exist, but power is exercised in an authoritarian or oppressive manner.

Questioning the Necessity of Revolution

He criticizes the revolutionaries for manipulating history, such as reviving memories of past religious persecution to incite hatred against innocent people in the present, including clergymen who have done nothing wrong.

Historical Manipulation

In his detailed analysis of France’s institutions, Burke argues that the new lawmakers in the National Assembly are too ambitious and lack the wisdom and patience required for careful reform. Examining their actions across various sectors including legislation, governance, the military, the courts, and the financial system, he concludes that they are incapable of fulfilling their responsibilities.

Critic of Revolutionary Policies and National Assembly

For example, the National Assembly’s decision to redraw the map of France into equal-sized districts for representation has worsened inequality rather than alleviating it. The already fragile French economy is likely to collapse, as it relies too heavily on seizing land from the church. Meanwhile, the army’s internal discipline has deteriorated, making it incapable of maintaining order or commanding respect.

Burke concludes by advising France to follow Britain’s model. He reiterates that change should be aimed at protecting existing freedoms while respecting ancestral traditions. In other words, France should pursue gradual reform rather than radical revolution.

Conclusion and Advice to France

Although he does not expect to change Depont’s mind, (Charles-Jean Francois Depont.) he urges him to reflect on Burke’s arguments, which are based on years of experience and careful observation. He warns that the French commonwealth may one day find itself in need of such wisdom.

Full Summary of Reflections on the Revolution in France by Edmund Burke

This new and up-to-date edition of a book that has been central to political philosophy, history, and revolutionary thought for two hundred years offers readers a dire warning of the consequences that follow the mismanagement of change. Written for a generation presented with challenges of terrible proportions--the Industrial, American, and French Revolutions, to name the most obvious--Burke's Reflections of the Revolution in France displays an acute awareness of how high political stakes can be, as well as a keen ability to set contemporary problems within a wider context of political theory.

history

History

artsandculture

Society, Arts & Culture

Edmund Burke (III)

Reflections on the Revolution in France

In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis examines the life of Christians in great detail, arguing that Christianity is a viable religion from a logical standpoint and defending the faith against its detractors.

Lewis discusses the law of human nature, stating that when looking at history, one cannot help but notice that moral rules are similar across different cultures at a basic level. He argues that moral law is not merely a human invention but a real, eternal thing created by an all-powerful being who exists outside of space and time. This being reveals itself to humanity through moral law.

First Part Of The Book

If I find in myself desires which nothing in this world can satisfy, the only logical explanation is that I was made for another world

Lewis explores different ideas about the nature of this all-powerful being. Pantheists believe that God, who has all power, is neither good nor bad and that everything in the world is divine. In contrast, religions such as Islam, Judaism, and Christianity believe that God created the universe but remains separate from it. Since God is good, these religions encourage people to work hard to make the world a better place. Christians, in particular, believe that the devil is the most evil being in existence.

Second Part Of The Book

However, in Christianity, evil is not an independent force but rather a corruption or misuse of good. Lewis observes that good has often been turned into evil in the world, which led him, in his youth, to question how a just God could allow such suffering.He argues that skeptics questioning the Christian concept of God must still rely on the same standard of justice and morality that, in the first part of the book, he established as evidence of God's existence.

Lewis then attempts to explain why a good God would allow bad things to happen by emphasizing the importance of free will. God grants people free will, which allows them to choose between good and evil, and they will be richly rewarded in heaven for overcoming temptation. At the end of part two, Lewis discusses Jesus Christ, the central figure of the Christian faith. He asserts that the only way to achieve true goodness is to worship Christ. Despite differences in Christian denominations, they all agree on the essential truths about Christ's presence, which unites them in salvation.

He focuses on how a good Christian should live. Lewis outlines three aspects of morality: harmony between people, harmony within oneself, and the constant pursuit of happiness. Moral virtues support these three aspects, while all sins violate at least one of them.

Third Part Of The Book

He briefly discusses the four cardinal virtues, 1. Prudence – Practical common sense, thinking through actions and their consequences.2. Temperance – Self-control, moderation, and avoiding excess.3. Justice – Fairness, honesty, and truthfulness in dealing with others.4. Fortitude – Courage, both in facing danger and enduring pain or hardship.and explains their importance in leading a moral life.

Four Cardinal Virtues

Lewis strongly defends chastity, which he acknowledges as the most unpopular Christian moral teaching. He critiques modern society for promoting excessive sexual indulgence and argues that, like any other human urge, sexual desire must be controlled. He also praises marriage, arguing that it is more profound and majestic than mere romantic love. According to Lewis, true commitment in marriage is about loyalty and mutual respect rather than simply following fleeting emotions. Lewis identifies pride as the worst sin because it leads people to place themselves above God.

Christian Moral

He warns that many who consider themselves good Christians actually worship a false god themselves and secretly believe they are better than others. If unchecked, this mindset can lead to damnation.

At the end of part three, Lewis discusses three theological principles: kindness, hope, and faith.1. Kindness – More than being nice, true Christian love (charity) requires selfless sacrifice.2. Hope – A deep longing for heaven, showing that earthly desires point to something beyond.3. Faith – Trusting in Christian teachings and ultimately relying on God's grace, not just personal effort.As Christians grow in their faith, they may reach a point of hopelessness, realizing the extent of their sinfulness. But, a true Christian perseveres, trusting that God will ultimately guide them to salvation.

Three Theological Principles

Lewis delves into theology, which he describes as the study of God. He examines the concept of the Holy Trinity, explaining that God is both one and three at the same time. He likens this to a die, which has six sides yet remains a single three-dimensional object.

Final Part Of The Book

Lewis also addresses the apparent contradiction between God's omniscience and human free will. If God knows everything, it may seem that people have no real choice in their actions.However, Lewis resolves this by explaining that God exists outside of time, meaning He perceives the past, present, and future simultaneously, while humans experience time linearly and thus have genuine free will.

Free Will

Lewis further argues that by worshiping Christ, people can transcend their mortal nature and share in divine life. In essence, those who follow Christ can become "sons of God." Good Christians unite in their love for God without losing their individuality.On the contrary, Lewis asserts that worshiping Christ is the only way to fully realize one’s true self. When a person prays, they assume the role of Christ, and through practice and faith, prayer can elevate them spiritually, ultimately leading them to heaven.

Good Christians

In heaven, people shed their earthly desires, which once defined their personalities, and instead discover their true selves unique individuals bound together by love for God. This unity is akin to how different organs in the body function independently yet work together to sustain life.

Lewis concludes that to be a Christian, one must relinquish worldly desires. In doing so, one gains Christ and experiences eternal happiness in heaven.

Conclusion

Full summary of Mere Christianity by C. S. Lewis

In the classic Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis, the most important writer of the 20th century, explores the common ground upon which all of those of Christian faith stand together. Bringing together Lewis’ legendary broadcast talks during World War Two from his three previous books The Case for Christianity, Christian Behavior, and Beyond Personality, Mere Christianity provides an unequaled opportunity for believers and nonbelievers alike to hear this powerful apologetic for the Christian faith.

Understand yourself and those around you.

psychology

Psychology

religionandspirituality

Religion & Spirituality

C. S. Lewis

Mere Christianity

Jesus chose ordinary people - fishermen, tax collectors, everyday workers - as his disciples. Extraordinary impact comes from ordinary people who are willing to be used for a greater purpose.

Power in Ordinary

Our weaknesses can become our greatest strengths.
Discover how Peter's impulsiveness, Thomas's doubt, and John's temper transformed into platforms for growth.
<ul><li>Personal flaws can lead to growth</li>
<li>Peter: impulsive</li>
<li>Thomas: doubtful</li>
<li>John: temperamental</li></ul>

Transformation Through Weakness

None of the disciples were religious scholars or elite leaders. Their qualification was simply their willingness to follow, demonstrating that authentic faith matters more than formal credentials.

Faith Over Credentials

From tax collectors to zealots, the disciples represented opposing social and political views, yet found unity in their shared mission proving that purpose transcends differences.

Unity in Diversity

Peter, the impulsive fisherman, became a rock of the early church, showing leadership potential lies within unpolished exteriors.Key ideas:<ul><li>Leadership potential often lies beneath unpolished exteriors</li><li>Peter transformed from a fisherman to a leader in the early church</li></ul>Keep in mind: Leadership skills can be developed over time, even for those who may seem unlikely candidates at first glance.

The Peter Principle

Thomas's famous doubt led to one of the strongest declarations of faith ("My Lord and my God!"), revealing how honest questioning can lead to deeper conviction.

The Power of Doubt

John evolved from a hotheaded "Son of Thunder" to the "Apostle of Love," demonstrating how divine love can fundamentally reshape character.

Love's Transformation

Judas walked with Jesus yet remained unchanged, teaching that mere proximity to truth doesn't guarantee transformation genuine surrender is required.

The Proximity Paradox

While some disciples were vocal leaders, others like Andrew worked quietly, bringing people to Jesus without fanfare – showing the power of behind-the-scenes influence.

Silent Strength

Jesus taught his status seeking disciples that true greatness comes through serving others, reversing conventional leadership wisdom.

The Service Secre

The disciples' greatest failures including deserting Jesus became stepping stones to their greatest impact, proving that failure isn't fatal to purpose.

Growth Through Failure

God chose ordinary men to accomplish extraordinary tasks, revealing that human limitations are no barrier to divine purpose.

The Great Paradox

How Jesus chose twelve unremarkable men; fishermen, tax collectors, and laborers and transformed them into world-changers. Their story proves that extraordinary impact can come from ordinary people.

Discover how God used ordinary men, Jesus's twelve chosen disciples, to change the world, and how He can accomplish the same thing through you.You don't have to be perfect to do God's work. Look no further than the twelve disciples, whose many weaknesses are forever preserved throughout the pages of the New Testament. Join bestselling author John MacArthur in Twelve Ordinary Men as he draws principles from Christ's careful, hands-on training of the original disciples for today's modern disciple, you! Jesus chose ordinary men--fishermen, tax collectors, political zealots--and turned their weakness into strength, producing greatness from people who were otherwise unremarkable. The twelve disciples weren't the stained-glass saints we imagine. On the contrary, they were truly human, all too prone to mistakes, misstatements, wrong attitudes, lapses of faith, and bitter failure. Simply put, they were flawed people, just like us. But under Jesus' teaching and touch, they became a force that forever changed the world.MacArthur takes you into the inner circle of the disciples--their selection, their training, their personalities, and their incredible impact. As MacArthur took a closer look at the lives of the twelve disciples, he found himself asking difficult questions along the way, including:<ul><li>Why did Jesus pick each of the twelve disciples?</li><li>How did Jesus teach them everything he could in just eighteen short months?</li><li>Can the lessons that Jesus taught the disciples can still influence our faith today?</li></ul>In Twelve Ordinary Men, you'll learn that disciples are living proof that God's strength is made perfect in weakness. As you get to know the men who walked with Jesus, you'll see that if he can accomplish his purposes through them, he can do the same through you.

John F. MacArthur

Twelve Ordinary Men

1. "The soul is here for its own joy." – Rumi

2. "What you seek is seeking you." – Rumi

3. "Not all those who wander are lost." – J.R.R. Tolkien

4. "The quieter you become, the more you can hear." – Ram Dass

5. "The universe is not outside of you. Look inside yourself; everything that you want, you already are." – Rumi

6. "The wound is the place where the Light enters you." – Rumi

7. "To know the truth is to know yourself." – Anonymous

Quotes that reflect the mystical aspects, especially for Lifepath 7..

Mystical quotes

1. "We are not just in the universe, the universe is in us." – Neil deGrasse Tyson

2. "The cosmos is within us. We are made of star-stuff. We are a way for the cosmos to know itself." – Carl Sagan

3. "Everything in the universe is within you. Ask all from yourself." – Rumi

4. "You are a universe, a world, a galaxy; you are everything that exists within the cosmos." – Anonymous

5. "Look at the stars. See their beauty. And in that beauty, see yourself." – Anonymous

6. "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you." – Neil deGrasse Tyson

7. "The cosmos is a vast drama, and we are players in it." – Anonymous

Quotes that reflect the cosmic aspects, especially for Lifepath 7

meditation

Meditation

Cosmic quotes

John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty explores the tension between individual freedom and the authority of society or government. Mill investigates this topic to address the question of how much influence society or government can justifiably exert over individuals’ lives.

Mill observes that the conflict between personal liberty and authority has existed since the beginning of time. This tension gave rise to the idea that liberty means freedom and protection from tyranny or abuse. Historically, this led to the establishment of representative governments, such as in the United States, where leaders are elected for limited terms and can be replaced by the people. However, Mill notes that oppression is not limited to governmental power, it can also arise from societal norms and pressures.

The Historical Struggle Between Liberty and Authority

When governments claim to represent the will of the people, they often represent only the will of the majority. This "tyranny of the majority" can impose its will on everyone, even if it contradicts individual preferences. This form of oppression is not limited to government but extends to social settings, where those who deviate from societal norms are punished in various ways.Mill argues that society must carefully consider how much public opinion should influence personal freedom and implement safeguards to prevent public opinion from gaining excessive power.

The Tyranny of the Majority

While it is essential to have rules preventing individuals from harming others, neither society nor government should dictate what people can or cannot do if their actions affect only themselves.

He acknowledges that government intervention is justified if it is for the good of society as a whole, particularly when an individual’s actions harm or risk harming others. However, as long as individuals do not violate the rights of others, they should have full control over their choices and actions. Mill also clarifies that this principle applies only to responsible adults, not to children.For Mill, individual liberty includes freedom of thought and expression, the right to choose one’s own path, and the ability to associate with others for any purpose that does not harm others.

The Role of Government in Personal Freedom

He criticizes how society often suppresses individuality by pressuring people to conform to majority opinions, either through laws or by spreading negative views about dissenters.

Mill focuses on individual liberty, particularly freedom of thought, speech, and action, and examines the limits of societal and governmental control over individuals. He notes that debates over the importance of freedom of the press are largely settled and instead discusses how societal pressures can prevent people from forming and expressing their own ideas.According to Mill, society’s tendency to suppress unpopular ideas hinders progress, as it prevents the exploration of potentially valuable truths.

Freedom of Expression and Its Social Importance

Silencing an opinion not only deprives society of the chance to evaluate its merits but also stops people from refining their understanding of other opinions in response. Open discussion and criticism are vital for a healthy society, as they help people avoid blindly following traditions and beliefs without fully understanding them.

Mill emphasizes the importance of listening to criticism of popular ideas, as it helps uncover hidden truths that can improve society. He believes human beings have the capacity to adapt and change when presented with better ideas, but this requires the freedom to discuss and challenge existing norms. Argument and debate about the truth of ideas keep their meaning alive and relevant.Despite the benefits of free expression, individuals who hold unconventional views often face social judgment or even legal repercussions.

The Role of Criticism in Social Growth

Mill worries that these pressures can lead to self-censorship, as people avoid expressing controversial opinions out of fear of being labeled immoral or heretical.This suppression stifles intellectual growth and denies society the opportunity to benefit from ideas that could combine with existing beliefs to create better outcomes.Mill argues that, while freedom of expression is crucial, views should not be protected by law from criticism. Instead, society should value the right to freely express, share, and discuss opinions, even if the public disapproves of how those opinions are presented.

After establishing the importance of freedom of expression, Mill turns to the value of individuality. He identifies a growing threat to individuality: societal indifference to its importance. Many people view uniqueness as a potential disruption to social order, yet they also recognize that mindless conformity is undesirable.

The Value of Individuality

The liberty of the individual must be thus far limited; he must not make himself a nuisance to other people.

Mill asserts that individuality is a fundamental aspect of human nature and that blindly following tradition stifles independent thought and creativity. Over time, this leads to a loss of the ability to think critically. In the past, individuals struggled to balance their individuality with societal rules; now, society struggles to encourage individuality and break free from the grip of tradition.When people fail to think for themselves or follow their natural inclinations, they risk losing essential qualities that define humanity; energy, creativity, and independent thought.

The Decline of Independent Thought

Mill argues that individuality and uniqueness are not only vital for personal development but also for social progress and the creation of new ideas.

Despite this, society often undervalues originality and creativity, prioritizing mediocrity over innovation. Mill warns that this trend threatens human advancement and urges people to embrace their individuality and creativity, rather than suppress them for the sake of conformity.

Embracing Individuality in a Conformist Society

Ultimately, Mill concludes that individuals should be free to do whatever they choose, as long as their actions do not harm others. He calls for a society that respects both personal liberty and individuality, recognizing their importance for the well-being of both individuals and the community.

Conclusion: The Balance Between Freedom and Harm

Summary of On Liberty by John Stuart Mill

In his much quoted, seminal work, On Liberty, John Stuart Mill attempts to establish standards for the relationship between authority and liberty. He emphasizes the importance of individuality which he conceived as a prerequisite to the higher pleasures-the summum bonum of Utilitarianism. Published in 1859, On Liberty presents one of the most eloquent defenses of individual freedom and is perhaps the most widely-read liberal argument in support of the value of liberty.

On Liberty

Find 100+ Philosophy Ideas, Insights & Facts - Curated from popular Videos, Podcasts, Books & Articles - Genuine Insights from like-minded Users like You!

Sweet Advices or Harsh Lessons?

Metamorphosis

Politics: A controversial court case

Reflections on the Revolution in France

Mere Christianity

Twelve Ordinary Men

Mystical quotes

Cosmic quotes

On Liberty

Time in the Cognitive Theoretical Model (CTMU): Illusion, Reality, or Both?

It's time to
Read like a Pro.

Sweet Advices or Harsh Lessons?

Metamorphosis

Politics: A controversial court case

Reflections on the Revolution in France

Mere Christianity

Twelve Ordinary Men

Mystical quotes

Cosmic quotes

On Liberty

Time in the Cognitive Theoretical Model (CTMU): Illusion, Reality, or Both?

It's time to Read like a Pro.

It's time to
Read like a Pro.